The Publishing Marathon: Navigating Competition and Cultivating Community Among Authors
As the literary world anticipates the return of esteemed contributor Kay next month, we delve back into a thought-provoking piece from three years ago that resonates deeply with the challenges many writers face: the complex interplay of competition and camaraderie in the publishing arena. This insightful exploration, originally penned by Kay, offers a valuable perspective on how authors can navigate the inherent pressures of their profession while fostering a supportive and collaborative environment.
The digital landscape of writing is often characterized by a fervent pursuit of recognition and success. While competition can be a potent catalyst for growth, pushing individuals to refine their craft and achieve new heights, it can also cast a shadow, fostering feelings of inadequacy and envy. This article revisits Kay’s reflections on this duality, examining why the seemingly objective nature of athletic competition offers a stark contrast to the nuanced and subjective world of publishing, and ultimately advocating for a more communal approach to the writing journey.
The Unvarnished Clarity of the Race Track
The author opens with a powerful dichotomy: "If you want to compete with somebody, run a race. If you want to change the world, write a book." This assertion immediately sets the stage for a critical examination of competition within different fields. The analogy drawn to athletic competition, specifically the 400-meter race, is particularly effective in highlighting its perceived fairness and transparency.
"Competition is good, right? It gives us a chance to test our mettle against others and see how we stack up," the original post posits, reflecting a common sentiment. In sports, the metrics of success are often clear-cut. The 400-meter race, as described, is a perfect illustration. It’s an event confined to individual lanes, ensuring each competitor navigates their own path without physical interference. The victor is unequivocally the one who crosses the finish line first. This objective outcome eliminates ambiguity. As Kay articulates, "The winner is the person who crosses the finish line first." There is no room for subjective interpretation, no quibbling over who "should" have won based on form, equipment, or external influences. The result is a definitive statement of speed and endurance on that particular day, fostering a sense of respect among participants regardless of their placement.
This clarity, however, is precisely what distinguishes athletic endeavors from the often-elusive landscape of professional writing. The "gold medal" in sports is tangible, earned through demonstrable performance. In publishing, the accolades are multifaceted and often influenced by a complex web of subjective factors.
The Subjective Arena: When Competition Turns Sour
The article then pivots to explore the "dark side" of competition, particularly within the writing community. It acknowledges that writers, by the very nature of their profession, are engaged in a constant, albeit often unspoken, competition. Books enter a crowded marketplace, vying for reader attention, critical acclaim, and commercial success. This inherent competition can amplify personal insecurities and lead to the corrosive emotions of jealousy and envy.

The scenario painted is relatable to many aspiring and established authors: the quiet despair of slow sales and lukewarm reviews juxtaposed with the celebratory announcements of friends securing lucrative publishing deals or winning prestigious awards. Kay wisely points out that these feelings, while perhaps uncomfortable and seemingly at odds with a writer’s desire to be a "nice person," are a common experience within the industry. The original post states, "Most authors have experienced some form of writer’s envy in their careers." This candid admission serves to normalize these emotions, suggesting that acknowledging them is the first step toward managing them.
The core of the issue lies in the subjective nature of success in publishing. Unlike a race where the fastest runner undeniably wins, the literary world’s "judges" – readers, agents, and publishers – approach a work through the lens of their individual experiences, tastes, and biases. The anecdote of a well-known writer receiving wildly disparate scores from judges in a contest – some in the 90s and one in the 50s – powerfully illustrates this point. This variability underscores the impossibility of a truly objective "win" in the same way an athlete achieves victory.
Reframing the Narrative: Publishing as a Marathon, Not a Sprint
To address the pervasive feelings of envy and competition, the article draws upon the wisdom of Erin Fulmer, who eloquently argues that "Publishing isn’t a race." Fulmer’s perspective shifts the paradigm from a finite competition with a clear finish line to a continuous journey. She highlights that even if publishing were a race, the frontrunner today might not maintain their lead indefinitely. The "heat death of the universe" serves as a humorous yet profound reminder of the vastness of time and the absence of a true, ultimate deadline for creative endeavors.
Crucially, Fulmer emphasizes that publishing is not a zero-sum game. The success of one author does not inherently diminish the opportunities for another. While direct competition for the same agent or editor with similar manuscripts can occur, the overall success of a genre or author can, in fact, elevate the entire field. The concept of a "rising tide often lifts all boats" is a powerful metaphor for the interconnectedness of the literary community.
The journey of a writer, as Fulmer posits, is defined by the act of writing itself. There is no singular endpoint that signifies ultimate victory, no "lifetime wish achievement." Instead, the focus shifts to the continuous process of creating – the next book, the next story. This perspective encourages a reorientation from external validation to intrinsic motivation and the enduring joy of the craft.
The Community Imperative: Beyond Individual Ambition
The article concludes with a call to adjust our perspective, urging writers to view themselves as a community rather than combatants. The essence of writing, it suggests, is to "enhance the human experience through the written word," and this can be achieved in myriad ways, each unique to the individual author.

The author advocates for embracing the idea that we each "get to choose the lane we run in and how we want to run the race." This empowers writers to define their own success and pursue their creative path without succumbing to the pressures of comparison. The insidious nature of envy, the piece argues, lies in its tendency to prioritize external markers of success over the intrinsic value of the creative process.
However, by focusing on the love for what we do, the pursuit of success can be harmonized with the genuine joy of writing. The article suggests that through dedicated study and hard work, "each circuit of the track" – each book, each project – can lead to improvement. In the long run, the true reward may not be the fleeting glory of winning, but the sustained growth and fulfillment derived from the journey itself. This is where the "gold in the gold medal" truly lies.
The piece ends with a heartwarming acknowledgment of the Kill Zone Blog (TKZ) community itself, celebrating its members’ willingness to offer support and suggestions, embodying the ideal of a writing community at its best.
Implications for the Modern Author
The enduring relevance of Kay’s 2020 post lies in its prescient examination of issues that continue to shape the authorial experience today. In an era of amplified social media presence and increasingly visible metrics of success, the pressures of comparison can be more intense than ever.
- Shifting Focus from Outcome to Process: The core implication is the necessity for authors to cultivate an internal locus of control. While external validation is a natural human desire, an over-reliance on it can be detrimental. By focusing on the craft, the enjoyment of storytelling, and continuous learning, writers can build resilience against the inevitable setbacks and perceived successes of others.
- Building a Supportive Network: The article underscores the vital importance of a strong community. Platforms like TKZ, writing groups, and critique partners provide essential emotional support, constructive feedback, and a sense of shared experience. In a profession that can often feel isolating, these connections are invaluable.
- Redefining Success: The traditional metrics of publishing success – bestseller lists, major awards, lucrative contracts – are not the only indicators of a fulfilling writing career. Authors are encouraged to define success on their own terms, which might include the impact of their stories on readers, the personal growth achieved through writing, or the simple act of completing a project they are proud of.
- Navigating the Digital Landscape Mindfully: The constant barrage of information about other authors’ achievements on social media requires a conscious effort to engage mindfully. This might involve setting boundaries, curating one’s feed, or taking breaks from platforms that trigger feelings of envy.
- Embracing the Long Game: The marathon analogy is crucial. Publishing success is rarely a meteoric event; it is often the result of sustained effort, perseverance, and continuous improvement over many years. Understanding this long-term perspective can help authors weather periods of perceived stagnation and celebrate incremental progress.
Ultimately, Kay’s revisited post serves as a timely reminder that while competition may be an unavoidable element of the publishing world, it need not define the author’s experience. By fostering a mindset of collaboration, self-compassion, and an unwavering dedication to the craft, writers can navigate the complexities of their profession with greater joy, resilience, and a deeper appreciation for the unique journey they are undertaking. The pursuit of changing the world, one word at a time, is a marathon, and the most profound victories are often found in the sustained stride and the enriching companionship along the way.
